Kubernetes training for controlled on-prem customer platform delivery

We offer private, instructor-led training for consultants implementing Kubernetes platforms within customer-owned infrastructure and security controls.

Your team understands platform components. An implementation must also respect the customer's operating requirements, including admission policy, access, network boundaries, evidence, and responsibility after handover.

LearnKube connects those constraints to a representative workload and platform design, with exercises that distinguish a compatible correction from bypassing a required control.

Discuss your team's training

Hands-on learning and the skills engineers take back to work.

Preview: course-wide figures are not yet available.

  • Hands-on learning
    60%
    Of instruction time spent on labs and challenges.
  • Troubleshooting confidence
    86%
    Of respondents report greater confidence diagnosing Kubernetes problems.
  • Relevant to your work
    92%
    Of respondents say the course addressed their engineering responsibilities.
  • Skills put into practice
    95%
    Of respondents applied their new skills at work within 90 days.

Make the implementation fit the customer's controls

  • Prepare a compatible platform design by mapping workload requirements to infrastructure and policy, so the implementation has explicit dependencies and owners.
  • Preserve required controls by examining admission and access behavior, so a successful deployment does not depend on unapproved exceptions.
  • Diagnose rejected or unavailable workloads by identifying the responsible policy or integration, so engineers can propose an appropriate correction.
  • Prepare acceptance and handover evidence by recording checks and operating duties, so the customer understands which controls it must maintain.

Admission and access rules are part of the delivery requirement

Kubernetes Pod Security Admission can enforce runtime requirements, while OpenShift Security Context Constraints provide distribution-specific controls. Their behavior is not interchangeable merely because both affect Pods. Consultants need to identify the customer's selected mechanism and its operating owner, then connect application requirements to a compatible configuration and useful acceptance evidence.

I ask which requirement a rejected workload violates before we discuss an exception. A Pod that starts after the customer's control is weakened does not demonstrate a compatible, supportable application configuration for that environment.

— Daniele Polencic, LearnKube founder and Kubernetes instructor

Customer task or requirementKubernetes decisionPractice
Translate security requirementsAdmission and workload settingsInspect a rejected Pod
Define implementation accessIdentities, verbs, and scopeVerify the intended permissions
Integrate local infrastructureNetwork and storage dependenciesDiagnose an unavailable service
Transfer control ownershipValidation and operating recordsExplain the maintained controls

Your team is not alone in controlled customer implementations

Red Hat infrastructure consultants implement customer container platforms, integrate networking and storage, apply security controls, lead workshops, and transfer operational knowledge. Their work includes on-prem and bare-metal environments.

For consultants with those responsibilities, we recommend a four-day workshop connecting Kubernetes mechanisms to the customer's implementation constraints and acceptance requirements.

A recommended four-day workshop for controlled platform delivery

This proposed agenda uses illustrative customer requirements and a selected distribution. Engineers practice explaining controls and verifying the behavior required for acceptance.

Day 1

We connect container behavior to Pods, controllers, Services, and probes. You will inspect the settings an application needs and the controls that govern admission.

Hands-on exercises

  • Deploy a sample workload within the selected policy.
  • Diagnose a rejected configuration and identify a compatible correction.

Day 2

You will use Helm and compare Kustomize while reviewing control-plane and node duties. We connect default settings to the customer requirements they are intended to support.

Hands-on exercises

  • Inspect rendered resources for an unintended privilege or dependency.
  • Identify the owner and access required for a platform-level change.

Day 3

We examine DNS, Services, ingress, policies, mesh use cases, and scheduling. The focus is required connectivity within the customer's infrastructure boundaries.

Hands-on exercises

  • Trace an allowed application connection through local controls.
  • Diagnose a blocked dependency or incompatible placement constraint.

Day 4

You will connect storage, secrets, autoscaling metrics, authentication, and RBAC to ongoing operations. We distinguish recorded configuration from evidence that a control behaves as intended.

Hands-on exercises

  • Verify application data and credential access using the intended identity.
  • Prepare an acceptance and handover record with control ownership and remaining dependencies.

Your customer security requirements, on-prem integrations, and handover duties can shape the agenda. Get in touch to tailor the workshop to your controlled platform implementations.

Explain the rejection before changing the control

When an engineer proposes broader permissions to fix admission, the instructor can inspect the policy decision and application needs. The team can identify whether the correction belongs in the workload or a customer-approved platform change.

Asked what he liked most about the course, Romain wrote:

good mix of hands-on and lecture. clear relevant labs and documentation.

— Romain, Solutions Engineer at F5.

Start with the controls your consultants must satisfy

Tell us which customer platforms you implement, what security and infrastructure constraints apply, and who operates the result. We will recommend technical exercises for those delivery boundaries.

Discuss your team's training